Continuous Security Posture &Assurance Management

SEE IT.FIX IT.PROVE IT.

Your security program assumes your controls work. CoreGuardian verifies it continuously. We read the tools you already run, rank the handful of problems that actually put the business at risk, and hand you the audit evidence.

See your organization’s risk.

In one walkthrough, see what matters, who owns it, and what proves it.

See riskRequest a demoSignals to first actionRead-only · No agents · 30+ connectors
Issues hub with six ranked findings, control-check and OSCAL evidence callouts

Built on the standards your auditors use

  • NIST SP 800-207
  • NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
  • CISA ZTMM
  • OSCAL
  • CNSA 2.0

Product overview

One record, from signal to proof.

Follow an illustrative scenario from connected signal to a ranked, owned issue tracked to closure (POA&M), then captured as tamper-evident evidence.

Connected workflowSignal → priority → proof

Zero Trust Exposure Management, with GRC built in

One platform. Four jobs.

01 · SeeAssets + identity

What’s here?

36

Laptops running a banned app

02 · CheckZero Trust posture

Is it set up right?

14

Laptops with EDR turned off

03 · FixExposure management

What do we fix first?

10

Ranked and assigned this week

04 · ProveGRC

Can we prove it?

4

Records tied to one fix

Each view works from the same record.

The loop follows one connected record from signal through business-context ranking, ownership, closure and tamper-evident evidence.

What nobody is checking

Deployed isn’t the same as working.

GRC checks that a control was deployed. The SOC watches what fires. Engineering knows what it built. Nobody checks, continuously, that the control is still running, still configured correctly, and still doing its job.

That gap is where risk actually lives. It is also why the board question takes two weeks to answer.

Product workflow

From disconnected data to proof your controls are improving.

CoreGuardian connects structured security records, ranks what matters, guides owned remediation, and turns the work into evidence.

Inventory
Identity inventory by type, privilege tier, and risk band
Issue detail
Issue detail showing a privileged identity linked to a risky asset with owner and status context
Risk posture
Asset risk posture with critical score and risk insights
Issues worklist
Issues worklist ranked by business risk with a toxic combination highlighted
Compliance Command Center
Compliance Command Center with authorization journey, audit readiness, and open POA&Ms

01 · Structured signal

Collect

Maintain structured security information from existing tools.

  • Assets
  • Software
  • Identities
  • Configurations
  • Vulnerabilities

02 · The Trace

Connect & Enrich

Normalize, reconcile, connect relationships, and enrich findings with CVE and threat context.

  • Normalize and clean
  • Reconcile duplicates
  • Connect relationships
  • Enrich with CVE and threat context
  • Surface conflicts and gaps

03 · Business context

Prioritize

Correlate business importance, exposure, vulnerabilities, identity context, and threat intelligence.

  • Asset importance
  • Internet exposure
  • Vulnerability context
  • Identity reach
  • Threat intelligence

04 · Owned work

Improve

Guide remediation, identify owners, track issues, and verify control status where signal exists.

  • Remediation guidance
  • Issue ownership
  • Tracked to closure
  • Control verification
  • Zero Trust posture

05 · Evidence

Prove

Turn control status and security activity into compliance evidence and audit-ready records.

  • Control verification results
  • Security posture status
  • SSPs
  • POA&Ms
  • OSCAL and framework evidence

The checklist says. CoreGuardian finds.

Illustrative findings based on common control failures.

The platform

One source of truth. Zero blind spots.

Verify every control, continuously.

  • One reconciled record per asset and identity across 30+ connectors.
  • Cross-tool contradictions surface as findings: Okta says authenticated, CrowdStrike says the agent is stale.
  • Zero Trust maturity per pillar from live connector signal, not a survey.
Exposure & RiskZero Trust Posture
Zero Trust posture
Zero Trust maturity matrix across CISA ZTMM stages with current pillar posture

How it works

Four steps. Nothing to rip out.

What goes into the ranking

Context, not CVSS alone.

Business context, exposure, identity reach and live exploitation decide the order. CVSS is one input, not the answer.

The same CVE on a domain controller and on a dev box are not the same problem. Only one of them needs fixing tonight.

Capabilities

Six jobs, one record underneath.

Pick a job. Watch the same system show up through a different lens. Nothing is copied, reconciled or re-entered between them.

01 / 06

Exposure & Risk Prioritization

A short list, ranked by what the business stands to lose.

Explore Exposure & Risk Prioritization

Federal & Defense

Built for the authorization lifecycle.

RMF’s seven steps, OSCAL SSP and POA&M, ATO state, time-boxed examiner sessions and FedRAMP 20x KSI tracking, all fed by the same verified record.

CoreGuardian for federal
The attribution ruleWho asserted AC-2 is implemented? Always a person on your team, never the vendor.

The platform owns the catalog. You own your assertions.

Where the boundary sits

What we do, and what we don’t.

We’d rather you hear it from us than find it in a demo.

What we do today
  • Read. Read-only connections to 30+ tools. We never need write access.
  • Reconcile. One record per asset and identity, with contradictions raised as findings.
  • Rank. A contextual score and a short, owned list, tracked to closure.
  • Prove. OSCAL SSP, POA&M and framework mappings from the same data.
What we don’t do
  • Change your environment. We never write to your tools. Fixes stay with the teams who own them.
  • Replace your stack. Your scanners, EDR and IdP keep doing their jobs. We verify they are.
  • Promise what isn’t shipped. Ask us about the roadmap in a demo.

30+ connectors

Works with the stack you already own.

See all integrations
  • Microsoft Entra ID
  • Okta
  • Google Workspace
  • SailPoint
  • Ping Identity
  • AWS
  • Microsoft Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • Wiz
  • CrowdStrike Falcon
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
  • Tanium
  • Palo Alto Networks
  • Cloudflare Zero Trust
  • Zscaler ZIA
  • Tenable Vulnerability Management
  • Qualys
  • GitHub

All product names and trademarks are the property of their owners. Use does not imply endorsement.

Built for practitioners

One record. Four ways in.

CISO

One posture answer

Board-ready evidence, and a case to consolidate budget lines rather than add one.

Security analyst

Dense triage, real owners

Contradictions as findings, toxic combinations and choke points, routed to whoever owns the fix.

ISSO / GRC

The lifecycle, continuous

RMF steps, OSCAL SSP, POA&M and ATO state, fed by live control data.

Assessor

Provenance you can check

Tamper-evident evidence, attributed assertions and time-boxed examiner access.

Resources

From the launch desk.

All posts
Launch
OCT 26, 2026

Introducing CoreGuardian: See it. Fix it. Prove it.

Read
Control verification
OCT 27, 2026

Deployed isn’t working: the control-verification gap

Read
Zero Trust
OCT 29, 2026

From survey to signal: measuring Zero Trust maturity from live data

Read

One source of truth. Zero blind spots.

See what CoreGuardian finds in your environment.

Read-only. No agents. Nothing to rip out.

Request a demo